© Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.
Here’s what you need to know as the U.K. weighs its options before the next leave-or-stay deadline
MORE THAN THREE YEARS AFTER BRITISH CITIZENS VOTED to withdraw from the European Union, “Brexit” seems more uncertain than ever. The original departure date of March 29, 2019 has been delayed twice, and the latest October 31, 2019 deadline may be pushed back further as British and European officials struggle to preserve key elements of free trade.
The saga has already cost two British prime ministers their jobs and cast doubts on the future of current leader Boris Johnson. But the real turmoil could come with a “hard Brexit”—if the U.K. leaves the EU with no trade agreement—says Kathryn Cassavell McDonald, vice president and market strategy analyst in the Chief Investment Office for Merrill and Bank of America Private Bank.
That scenario could lead to new tariffs, higher costs for consumers, setbacks for the U.K. and EU economies and challenges for U.S. companies who do business in both areas, she says. Though fears of a hard Brexit have abated somewhat in recent weeks, a new CIO report, “‘Hard Brexit’ Q&A,” explains why the worst could still happen, what to look for next, and what’s at stake.
Johnson, a Brexit advocate, has threatened to pull out by October 31 with or without a trade agreement, McDonald notes. Yet a new British Parliament law requires him to seek a deadline extension if no deal is struck, at least temporarily averting a hard Brexit. “The EU would probably grant that extension, and a solution would be kicked further down the road,” McDonald believes.
With so little certainty on any front, McDonald outlines five possible outcomes:
While a hard Brexit would likely have only a modest long-term effect on the global economy, it could create significant challenges for U.S. companies.
The answer could hinge on British elections that would likely take place if the October 31 deadline is extended—and there’s no perfect scenario. “If the Conservative Party increases power, prospects of a hard Brexit would rise,” she says. “A surprise victory by the Labour government could result in more anti-business policies, and a hung parliament could just cause more delays and uncertainty.”
“Losing preferential access to the EU market would be a significant blow to U.K. companies,” McDonald says. “Exports to the EU make up more than 13% of U.K. GDP.” The economic impact on the EU, while lower, would still be substantial, she adds. Along with tariffs, a hard Brexit would result in other trade barriers, such as customs inspections and regulatory and compliance hurdles.
“The most likely early effect, in my opinion, would be a decline in the value of the British pound, resulting in higher inflation in the U.K., and higher costs for goods imported from the U.S. and elsewhere,” notes McDonald. While a hard Brexit would likely have only a modest long-term effect on the global economy, it could create significant challenges for U.S. companies. “For decades the U.K. has been a strategic, profitable gateway to EU markets for U.S. multinationals,” she says. “They may now have to rethink their global supply chains.”
“Given higher uncertainties in Europe and the U.K., we’re cautious about international developed markets right now,” McDonald says. “We think investors should consider having their portfolios focus more on the United States, where the U.S. economy and consumers remain strong.” Despite potential challenges for U.S. multinationals, it’s too soon for investors to take action, she believes. “This is something we’ll watch very closely,” McDonald says. “But the potential paths for the U.K. and Brexit are so diverse that the important thing is to maintain a balanced portfolio exposed to very strong companies.”
Opinions are those of the author and subject to change. The investments or strategies presented do not take into account the investment objectives or financial needs of particular investors. It is important that you consider this information in the context of your personal risk tolerance and investment goals. Due to the time-sensitive nature of the content and because investment opinions may have changed since the time any comments were made by research analysts, the latest Merrill investment opinion and investment risk rating for any particular security discussed should be reviewed, including important disclosures, before making an investment decision.
International investing presents certain risks not associated with investing solely in the U.S. These include, for instance, risks related to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the value of other currencies, custody arrangements made for a fund’s foreign holdings, political risks, differences in accounting procedures and the lesser degree of public information required to be provided by non-U.S. companies. Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risks than investing in more developed countries. In addition, concentration of investments in a single region may result in greater volatility.
Currency risk is the risk that exchange rate fluctuations will reduce the value of returns. This arises when investments denominated in foreign currencies are purchased.
The Chief Investment Office, which provides investment strategies, due diligence, portfolio construction guidance and wealth management solutions for Global Wealth & Investment Management (“GWIM”) clients, is part of the Investment Solutions Group (“ISG”) of GWIM, a division of Bank of America Corporation.